Showing posts with label worship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label worship. Show all posts

Monday, April 22, 2019

A Rite of Spring


"The question is not whether we believe in resurrection 
but whether we have known it -- 
known it in our own lived experience, 
seen it in the lives of others, 
felt it in the world around us."


For the last two decades or so, on the Sunday the majority of Christians celebrate Easter, every congregation I have served has held a service titled, "A Rite of Spring:  An Eastertide Celebration in Two Acts."  It is a visually rich service of readings and hymns, much like many Christmas Eve services, an it is one of the things from my time as a parish minister of which I am most proud.  I think it is an authentic expression of Unitarian Universalism -- both our message and our method.
'
Back in 2016 I posted the text of "A Rite of Spring."  It is a very different thing to read the text without being able to see the roughly 100 images that are projected throughout or to experience the beauty of the hymns.  Still, even by themselves I think the words are worth considering.  If you're interested, here is the link:



Pax tecum,

RevWik


Thursday, February 02, 2012

Of Meetings and Meaning, part 3


And so the question -- did the "experiment" work?  I think that there are several ways of answering this.

I've heard many people say that they really appreciated the way the meeting kept returning to song, or to the unison reading of words important to this community.  They said that it helped keep them grounded in they why of what we were doing.  To the extent that this was true for people, than I would certainly say that it was a successful meeting.

Yet within many of these same comments there is the caveat -- that things went well until we began to disagree with each other.  People have talked about "spoiling the positive atmosphere" that had been created.  Some even called this, "painful."  To the extent that this was people's experience, than the experiment failed or, at least, did not succeed fully.

And I don't mean, by this, that it "failed" because there were hard discussions and hard feelings.  There were supposed to be!  Or, rather, there was supposed to be space for them if it was needed.  The whole idea of a congregational meeting is that it is a chance for the entire congregation to take ownership, and have a real voice, in the work that most of the rest of the time has been delegated to the few in formal leadership positions.  We cannot always work as "a committee of the whole," and so certain individuals and groups have been given the authority to make decisions and do things on behalf of the whole.  And, yet, it would not be right for our faith community to abdicate its authority to govern itself and, so, on a regular basis the leadership brings some of its decisions and actions before the whole congregation for their input.

Some may think that it's the desire of the Board, for instance, to have all of its recommendations adopted.  And, indeed, it would only be human for that to be true to some extent.  Yet if we're serious about calling these congregational meetings opportunities for input, then it must -- must -- be intended to take seriously any and all input.  And that includes disagreement and debate.  Let me hang on this for a moment longer to be absolutely clear:  when the board or a task force brings its recommendations to the floor of a congregational meeting, whether they know it or not, they are truly asking for the opinion of the whole community on the work that they've been doing on its behalf.  If that opinion is negative, then that is what they want to hear.  If the congregation, as a whole, disagrees with an idea that's been worked on by the leaders, then it's important for those leaders to hear that and for things not to move forward.

There is nothing here that "spoils" anything.  In fact, honest disagreement honors the "mood" by demonstrating that this really is a space in which people can speak their minds.  In the Unison Affirmation of the first congregation that I served there was the phrase, "we respect differences of opinion and strive to be a democratic community."  I often said to them, "How can we know that we 'respect differences of opinion' if we never have any?"  This is a sign of health, not disease.

From my vantage point, much of the "heat" that was generated during the meeting had to do with parliamentary process as opposed to the actual issues being discussed.  Folks seemed to be doing quite well listening to members explaing why they thought a particular revision to the bylaws that was being proposed was a not a good idea.  Folks seemed to be in general agreement that this particular item should be left for further study.  Yet people were getting downright irate that there was more than one motion on the floor at a time, or that discussion was called for before a motion had been made, or that someone was "calling the question" in a way or at a time that was not exactly according to Hoyle.

This put me in mind of the line from Marge Piercy's poem with which we began the service in which she said, "We talked about the table, and the chair, and the chairperson, and the motion to table the chair."  I came away from this experience convinced that we need to either hold some kind of brief "intro to parliamentary procedures" prior to each such meeting, and provide some kind of handy "cheat sheet" for folks to use during it, or that some model other than Robert's Rules should be used.

Heresy, I know, but Robert's Rules is not sacred scripture (despite its inclusion in my photo above).  It's simply one model that's been developed for helping a meeting to run smoothly.  Yet as U.S. Army Brigadier General Henry Martyn Robert himself noted when his rules were first published in 1876, if the rules themselves got in the way of the smooth running of a meeting than the disrupting rule(s) should be ignored.  The bottom line was not a slavish adherence to Robert's Rules, but ensuring the smoothest and most effective meeting.  In the 136 years since the Brigadier General's rules were first published, communities have experimented with many other models.  It is possible, that for a liberal faith community in the 21st century, that there might be another way.

Be that as it may, though, for now.  I am convinced that this experiment was a success . . . if seen as a first step.  There is certainly more work to do -- both from the strategic/planning perspective but also in the lived-in experience dimension.  Some plants take time before they bear fruit.  I, for one, am hoping that this new plant will be given more time to grow.

In Gassho,

RevWik

Of Meetings and Meaning, part 2


Note:  what follows is the Order of Service for our Congregational Meeting/Communal Worship service.  The full text of certain sections have been included as end-notes to help give some of the feel of the words being heard.  A podcast of select sections will be posted to the TJMC website.
Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church - Unitarian Universalist
      717 Rugby Road, Charlottesville, VA  22903         434-293-8179        uucharlottesville.org
Rev. Erik Walker Wikstrom, Minister
Chaplain Alexandra McGee, MDiv. Ministry Associate

Leia Durland-Jones, Director of Religious Education

Robyn Fogler, Religious Education Assistant

Scott DeVeaux, Acting Director of Music

James Smith, Piano
Please put cell phones and any other electrical device into silent mode but feel free to leave them on.



~ Preparations for Worship ~

Greetings by the Board  (1)

Prelude 


Contextualization   (2)

Unison Reading: The TJMC Mission Statement
Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church is a church of the liberal tradition rooted in the heritage of Unitarian Universalism and dedicated to the belief that in every individual there are extraordinary possibilities.  We are committed to the individual and collective pursuit of spiritual growth, social justice, and life-long religious education and understanding.  We foster an open and free community in which we share our gifts, care for one another, and honor our differences.  We seek to have a lasting influence on local, national, and global programs that promote equity and end oppression.

Chalice Lighting 
We kindle these flames as a sign of our commitment to live by the following principles
Red reminds us to respect the worth and dignity of every person
We affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity of every person
Orange reminds us to offer fair and kind treatment to others
We affirm and promote justice, equity and compassion in human relations
Yellow reminds us to yearn to learn throughout life
We affirm and promote acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations
Green reminds us to grow in our ongoing search for truth and meaning
We affirm and promote a free and responsible search for truth and meaning
Blue reminds us to believe in our ideas and act on them
We affirm and promote the right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large
Indigo reminds us to insist on peace, freedom and justice for all
We affirm and promote the goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all
Violet reminds us to value our interdependent connection with the web of life
We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.  And we light our own chalice as a commitment that our work begins here, at this time, in this congregation.  Amen.

* Approval of the Minutes of the Last Congregational Meeting

Song: #1018, Come And Go With Me


~ Celebrating Who We Are ~ 

A Litany of Leadership  (3)

* Approval of Amy Wissekerke to Board

* Approval of Nancy Briggs to Leadership Development

Song: #1028, The Fire of Commitment 

~ Celebrating What We’re Doing ~ 

Facilities Task Force Update 

Staffing Task Force Update

Music Task Force Update 

Choir:  Deep River 

Candles for Our Community  (4)

Head’s Up on Proposed Policy Regarding Delegates 

* Green Sanctuary Task Force Update 

Announcement of Board Initiative (5)

Song: #1008, Blue Boat Home 

Unison Reading: TJMC Covenant (read left/right) 
In order to create the beloved community we all desire for ourselves, we,
the Congregation of Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church Unitarian Universalist covenant to:
(L) Communicate with compassion and respect, especially when we disagree,
(R) Celebrate diversity and nurture our inclusivity,
(L) Embrace one another spiritually and emotionally,
(R) Promote social justice within our congregation and the larger community,
(L) Generously support the ministries of the church with time, money and enthusiasm, and
(R) When we have fallen short, lovingly call each other back into covenant.

* Approval of New Bylaws 

Report from the Treasurer

Offering 

~ Preparations for Service ~ 

Prayer (spoken and silent) 

Song: #1010, Oh We Give Thanks

Unison Benediction: #474, Unto the Church Universal

Postlude

**************************************



(1)  Greetings by the Board
Good morning! Welcome to Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church Unitarian Universalist. My name is Donna Baker, and on behalf of our Board of Trustees I would like to say how good it is to see friends old and new!

We strive to be an intentionally inclusive congregation:
Whoever you are / Whomever you love / However you express your identity;
Whatever your situation in life / Whatever your experience of the holy –
Your presence here is a gift.
All Are Worthy.
All Are Welcome!!
Whether you are filled with sadness, overflowing with joy, needing to be alone with yourself, or eager to engage with others, you belong here. You are seen here.

I’d like to extend special hospitality to those of you who are here for your first, second, or third time. So that others may easily recognize you and greet you personally during the social hour, please stand for a moment (or raise your hand) if you are willing.
Thank you.
I’d also like to extend special hospitality to parents with small children.  One measure of the health of a congregation is the way it welcomes its littlest members.  Yet it can also be helpful for parents to know that we have a Comfort Room just outside and to the right of the back doors of the sanctuary so that there is a place to go if you prefer.  The sound from the service is broadcast into that room.
If you have would like information about our church or are interesting in becoming a member, please see our Membership Table in the Social Hall,   If you have found a spiritual home and are ready to join the church, please stop by the Membership Table or contact Rev. Erik sometime during the week.
At this time I’d ask you to please silence your phones and other electronic devices, but feel free to leave them powered on. You might want to use them during the service to connect with someone who is not here this morning.
Please take the time to read the weekly announcements that are inserted in the Order of Service.  There is a lot going on in this lively community.
As always, everyone is invited to enjoy refreshments and conversation in the Social Hall after the service.
While this is the end of the "script", I want to take a moment to tell you how personally excited I am about today's service. As I mentioned before, I found that last year as the president at TJMC profoundly changed my relationship with you,  the congregation, spirituality and "church" in general. I understand that leadership is not necessarily everyone's calling - but I do challenge you to be open to that possibility. Today is one experiment in leadership - and the interrelatedness with how we practice our spirituality, I thank you all for being part of this service as we intertwine our the work of the church with our worship.
Once again, welcome to church.  It is good to be together.
                                                 


(2)  Contextualization
I am on record as saying that everything – everything – a church does should be directed toward the deepening and expanding of the spiritual lives of its members.  This includes the “work” of the church – its meetings, its governance structures, the work of its committees and groups.  So it makes sense to me that we see our congregational meetings as experiences of communal worship.
I’ve also shared before my belief that the 21st century church needs to reevaluate its understanding of “membership,” which has inadvertently become essentially an institutional category rather than first and foremost an expression of connection and commitment.
This morning, then our congregational meeting is our worship service and our worship service is our business meeting.  The experiment we’re engaged in is to see if we can blur those distinctions, break down the sense of the sacred/secular split that so often makes the work of the church and the work of our souls seems like, at best, distant cousins.
But that means that we recognize as sacred all aspects of our meeting – the celebrations, the appreciations, the questions, the debates, the disagreements, the nit picking . . . all of it.  This isn’t intended to be an experiment in sanitized homogeneity.  Rather, it’s an attempt to recognize that what we do together – all of it, the messy reality of it – is sacred.
We’re also experimenting with the broader understanding of “membership” that I explored in my blogs this summer and my first sermon here – if you’re here, if you’re participating, you’re a member.  One way of expressing this sense is to give everyone a voting card, everyone a voice.  This is, I’ll say again, an experiment.  We’ll see how it feels.  And because, as a legal entity this church needs to follow its bylaws – which stipulate that only official, signed members can vote – we’ve given out two differently colored voting cards:  yellow for official members and orange for, let’s say, “participating members.”  When it comes time for a vote everyone will have a voice, everyone will be welcome to raise their cards “yea” or “nay.”  At the same time, we will be able to determine the relative “yea-ing” and “nay-ing” of our formal membership as demanded by our bylaws.
This section of the sermon has been billed as the “contextualization.”  So far it’s really been more of an “explanation,” or, perhaps, an “exposition.”  The real context comes when we put our gathering in line with our understanding of who we are as a faith community, and who we intend to be.  To do that, I encourage you to join with me now in reading together the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church – Unitarian Universalist Mission Statement (which is printed in your order of service).

(3)  Litany of Leadership
It is not uncommon for congregations, at gatherings such as this, to identify and appreciate those who have served in leadership.  And while some people’s service is obvious, it takes each and every one of us to make TJMC the community that it is.  Therefore, I now invite you to rise or raise your hand if in this past year you have:  served on the Board of Trustees; served on one of our Councils; served on one of our Committees or Task Forces; taught religious education with our children and youth; taught an adult faith development class; facilitated a covenant group . . . or participated in a covenant group; sang in the choir or provided other music; led or organized one of our social justice efforts . . . or participated in one of our social justice efforts; wove worship . . . or attended worship!
It takes each of us and all of us to make TJMC the community that it is.  Each of us here is part of the secret of our success; each of us has a ministry and each of us matters.  Can I get an “Amen.”  Hallelujah.

(4)  Candles for Our Community
As we hear about the work of some of the Task Forces that have been active, it seems appropriate to remember some of the many other activities that give this community its special cast.  As I read a name, Bob will light a candle:  UU Christian Fellowship; Clear Spring Buddhist Sangha;  Nature Spirit; Labyrinth Ministry; Active Minds; Covenant Groups; Pastoral Visitors; CareNet; Music Ministry (of choir and instrumentalists); Worship Weavers; Children’s Religious Education; Adult Faith Development; PACEM; IMPACT; Food Pantry; Soup Kitchen; Peace Action – United Nations; Emotional Wellness Ministry; Green Sanctuary – Environmental Action; Refugee Partnership; Partner Churches; UU Service Committee; Chalice Lighters; Remembrance Garden; Gay Straight Alliance; UUse Guys; and UUppity Women.  These things and more help make us who we are.


(5)  Announcement of a Board Initiative

Our people are our flame. We inspire each other to burn brightly and practice those things that enliven us through community, action, and worship.

Our church is our chalice. This church is our physical and spiritual home. Our leadership, our organization, our building, and our place in the Charlottesville community make up the structure that cradles our flame.

Our church embodies who we are, what we do, what we stand for. We have worn the flag of marriage rights proudly on our church to bear witness to the injustices we stand against. We now have the opportunity to bear public witness to our seventh principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.

Some few weeks past, the board was presented with the opportunity to install a photovoltaic array and benefit from a rebate program to help offset that cost. It was shortly thereafter realized that the cost of replacing our flat roof could be contained within the rebate, in effect giving us that which we desire and what we need in the same project.

This array is an investment in what we stand for. It will be partially visible from rugby road, standing mute testament to our commitment to reduce our impact on the environment. We have just voted on our commitment to a green sanctuary. We have done much to reduce our energy savings; we can and are going to do so much more.

The flat roof between the main church and the social hall is well beyond it’s expected life and compared to today’s energy standards, lacking. Over the next few weeks, we will be replacing that leaky roof with one that is thicker, more robust, and better insulated. On top of this new roof, we will install the solar array that will provide almost a quarter of the energy needs of the main church building.

This system will last many years, guaranteed to produce power up to 25 years, potentially longer. We will derive its benefits immediately through our public witness and over the long term through reduced energy costs. For the next 25 plus years, we will be a model for how a responsible faith community can and should care for their own body, their church, their chalice.

Such great steps do come with a cost. This project will not be inexpensive. After replacing the roof, installing the solar array and receiving the rebate, we estimate our final cost to be just under $70,000 dollars. We have studied the risk and benefits of installing a solar array of this size and found that we can do it. We have the funds, we have the motivation, we have faith that this is the right thing to do. If you feel compelled to contribute, we welcome your financial support. We welcome all to give as they so desire, but know that we can and will go forward bravely and responsibly.

The board met in several extra sessions to discuss this initiative. Written by W.E.B DuBois, the opening words of one such meeting best personify our decision to move forward to care for ourselves, our church…

Now is the accepted time, not tomorrow, not some more convenient season.
It is today that our best work can be done and not some future day or future year.
It is today that we fit ourselves for the greater usefulness of tomorrow.
Today is the seed time, now are the hours of work, and tomorrow comes the harvest and the playtime.

Of Meetings and Meaning, part 1


On Sunday, January 29th, 2012, the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church -- Unitarian Universalist engaged in an experiment.  It was the day of our Congregational Meeting, and the Executive Committee had, several months previously, discussed the logistics of it. 
  • Should we have it after the second service?  (If so, how many of the folks who normally come to the first service would return later for the meeting?  And, for that matter, how many of the folks who come to the second service would want to stick around afterward for a business meeting likely to run an hour or two?) 
  • Should we try to have the meeting between the first and second services?  (There'd be the time constraint of having to be done in time to begin the second service, and there'd still be the question of people staying from the first service or coming early for the second.)
  • Should we have it instead of the second service?  (To the questions already raised came the objection that a business meeting is not a simple swap, one-to-one replacement for a worship experience.)
Suddenly, a light bulb went off in my head.  In the service of full disclosure, my most recent book -- Serving With Grace:  lay leadership as a spiritual practice -- puts forth the assertion that everything a church does should be part of its efforts to deepen and expand the spiritual life of its membership.  I argue that the dichotomy between the "spiritual side" of one's church experience and the "work of the church" is a false one.  Like a total immersion language school, church life can be understood (and experienced!) as a total immersion school of the soul where everything -- even the meetings and committee work -- is one with the worship services and the religious education.

And so, having literally written the book on this subject, I put forth the notion that we not replace our Sunday service with our business meeting but rather, and far more interestingly, that we truly transform our business meeting into a worship service!

To say that folks were skeptical would be to make a gross understatement.  And, to be honest, I was a little anxious about whether it would work, too.  (After all, I've often jokingly said that I went back into parish ministry so that I could see for myself if any of the ideas in my book --which I wrote while working at UUHQ -- would work in the real world!) 

Well . . . yesterday at 10:15 am the experiment began.  At approximately 12:15 it ended.  And while there are some who are still skeptical -- and no doubt some who are displeased -- most of the feedback I've received so far is extremely positive.  Some are even declaring it "a success" and saying that we should plan on doing our May meeting in this same way.

To be sure, the meeting/worship began with extremely high energy and positive feelings.  (How could it not have when the opening words were Marge Piercy's fantastic poem, "Report of the fourteenth subcommittee on convening a discussion group" from her book Mars and Her Children?)  And things stayed remarkably upbeat -- not to mention on schedule to have the meeting end at our anticipated 90 minute mark! -- until we got to a vote on a group of bylaw revisions.  Here things got a little contentious.

Yet at the very beginning I had said, "we [need to] recognize as sacred all aspects of our meeting -- the celebrations, the appreciations, the affirmations, the questions, the debates, the disagreements, the nit picking . . . all of it.  This isn't intended to be an experiment in sanitized homogeneity.  Rather, it's an attempt to recognize that what we do together -- all of it, the messy reality of it -- is sacred."  My biggest fear, in fact, going forward with the experiment was that people would feel so concerned about maintaing some sense of "positive feelings" (this is a worship service after all!) that some would then also feel coerced into going along.  Simply put, I was afraid that some people would feel that their critiques and criticism were not welcomed or wouldn't be considered "appropriate" and, so, would feel that they'd had their voices stifled.

Happily, I can say that that was not the case!  People did disagree!  A motion was defeated.  And, aside from some confusion and consternation arising from the perceived intricacies of parliamentary procedure, everything ran smoothly.  Even the debates.  People were by and large respectful of one another.  People were definitely given an opportunity to express themselves, and express themselves they did.

In my next post I'll share the Order of Service that was developed.

In Gassho,

RevWik

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Smartphones Come To Church


Several weeks ago we began an experiment in worship at the congregation I am privileged to serve, the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church– Unitarian Universalist in Charlottesville, Virginia.  It is an expansion of an idea I first saw discussed on the UU Worship Lab, a FaceBook group dedicated to exploring the art and science of worship.

At the beginning of the service we ask that people silence their cell phones but leave them on.  Near the end of the service, during the Offering/Offertory, we ask everyone to think of a person or people who had had an impact on their lives and who are not in the sanctuary this morning.  Congregants are invited hold these people in their hearts and minds, or to take out their mobile devices and text, tweet, FaceBook, or e-mail those people.  In this way, we've said, we can each make an offering not only of our financial support, but also of our reaching out to others.

After the first service in which we did this one person said to me, “I’ve never been told to text in church before!”  And it is clear that many people have eagerly taken up the invitation.  I’m sure that not everyone is happy about it, though.  I know that there are some people who think of the sanctuary on Sunday mornings as just that – a sanctuary.  And one of the things these people are wanting a peaceful haven from is the incessant bombardment of all things tech.  Why, then, in this of all places, should we be inviting people to engage in such behavior?

Why indeed?  I’ve been thinking about this a lot leading up to actually giving it a try.  Is it just a fad?  An attempt to reach out to younger people?  A novel way of saying, “We’re hip and cool; give us a try”?

Perhaps.  All of these are certainly possible and, I’d be the first to admit, probable at some level.  And yet I think that there’s more to it than this.  And as I looked for what it is, I’ve found myself thinking about Martin Luther.

That sixteenth century German priest sparked a revolution, in part, because of his belief that all baptized Christians constituted a holy priesthood – “the priesthood of all believers” – and his insistence on translating the Bible from Latin into the German vernacular so that it was accessible to more people.  Both of these ideas were scandalous at the time.  I also think that both of these ideas are present in the idea of including a time for tweeting in our service.

For a generation of people, the smart phone (and related devices) are not just tools or gadgets – they are truly an extension of self.  This may not be true for me, or even you, but it is undeniably true for many people in our world today.  They have grown up texting one another even while talking to someone else, and the ability to make immediate comments on and connections with what’s happening around them is taken for granted.

I don’t think that it’s too much of a stretch to say that texting, tweeting, instant messaging, and the like are a part of the vernacular of this generation.  And just as Luther came to realize that insisting on a Latin Mass was keeping his generation of Christians away from a deeper connection with their faith, I can’t help wondering if our “no cell phone” policies are doing the same thing for this generation. 

Think about it for a moment.  For those who do use such devices regularly, anything and everything that’s considered at all relevant is instantly shared with a circle of cyber “friends” who, then, comment in return.  And yet in church, which I believe should be the most relevant of experiences in the week, this behavior is actively discouraged.

As an aside, for those who think that encouraging the use of these handheld devices would be distracting – either to the people doing it or the people near to them – how many of our congregations forbid knitting during the service?  I known of parishioners who bring their mail into worship and pay their bills.  I’ve even heard of a parishioner who brought his copy of the New York Times and would unfold it and read it during the sermon.  Is quietly sending a text any more disturbing to the “sanctity of the hour” than that?

And from the point of view of those for whom this is all second nature, not doing these things is distracting!  Imagine, if you’re a note taker, that you were forbidden to bring a pencil into worship.  Or, if you like to close your eyes to focus on what you’re hearing, you found that the church had instituted an “eyes wide open” policy.  And yet this is exactly what we do when we tell everyone that they must turn off and put away these extensions of self.

At first, we're limiting the use of these electronics to this one place in the service and this one purpose, to reach out to people who aren't with us in the sanctuary.  (Although folks have confessed to me that they've taken advantage of the invitation to text the spouse who was sitting right next to them!)  But who knows?  I recently came across a video advertising the free services of YouVersion Live, a way to seamlessly interact with worship leaders and fellow congregants during worship on your mobile phone.  Some of the things they suggest seem odd to me; some seem amazingly useful.

I hope that there'll be conversation about this idea.  I hope, even more, that others will be encouraged to give it a try so that we can learn from one another's actual experiences (rather than simply sharing all of our own biased and preconceived assumptions).

 In Gassho,

Rev. Wik

Monday, August 22, 2011

Putting Ourselves In The Story

I preached for the second time in my new church home yesterday.  This is what I said:




A story (adapted from a story by Eli Wiesel): 

A long time ago a devastating calamity befell a small Jewish village.  The people turned to their rabbi, known for his great spiritual gifts, and begged for help.  The rabbi went to a special place in the forest.  He built a fire, laying the wood in a particular intricate pattern.  And then he uttered a sacred prayer.  And the calamity was averted.
Generations passed, and once again extremely hard times fell upon the village.  Once again, the people went to their rabbi.  And this rabbi, too, went out to that special place in the forest.  But over time the secret of how to build the intricate fire had been lost.  “I am here,” the rabbi said, “and I still know the prayer.  This must be enough.”  And it was enough.  The village was saved.
Generations passed.  Once more the hard times; one more the request of the rabbi.  This rabbi went to the special place in the woods.  “I do not know how to build the fire,” the rabbi said.  “And I no longer know the sacred prayer.  But I am here, and this must be enough.”   And it was enough.  Once again, the people were safe.
In recent times this village once again knew great fear and tribulation.  Once more the people went to their rabbi, as their ancestors and their ancestors had before them.  But this rabbi did not go into the woods.  She went into her study.  And there she lit a candle and said, “Generations ago we forgot how to build the intricate fire.  And the words of the sacred prayer have long been lost.  I no longer even know where the special place in the woods is.  But I do know the story, and that must be enough.”  And it was enough.
It was enough because, as it’s been said, “God made humankind because God loves stories.” 
Stories.  Legends.  Myths.  Life.
Our life – yours and mine.  They’re stories.  Stories.  And as the great mythologist Joseph Campbell taught so many back in the late ‘80s and early 90’s, they’re not just independent stories, not just ours and ours alone, but the stories of our lives are stories within Stories.  There’s the hero’s journey.  And the exodus story of movement from bondage to freedom.  And there’s death and resurrection.  And the embrace of the “Other” within community.  These Grand Stories are our stories, and our stories are these Stories.
In the Introduction to the companion volume for the PBS series The Power of Myth, Bill Moyers wrote:
“One of my colleagues had been asked by a friend about our collaboration with Campbell:  “Why do you need the mythology?”  She held the familiar, modern opinion that “all these Greek gods and stuff” are irrelevant to the human condition today.  What she did not know – what most do not know – is that the remnants of all that “stuff” line the walls of our interior system of belief, like shards of broken pottery in an archeological site.  But as we are organic beings, there is energy in all that “stuff.”
Stories.  Stuff.  The Stuff of Life.  The Staff of Life.  The Spirit of Life.  Our life – yours and mine.  You can feel it, sometimes, when you encounter a really well-told tale; you can feel that this story is yours, too.  And there are times when you’re going through whatever it is that you’re going through at the time and you realize – you can see it and feel it – the Tragedy or the Comedy of it all.
The majority of the world’s religions that we humans have developed have made explicit use of this mutual identification.  Each holds up a story, or a connected canon of stories, and encourages their adherents to align the story of their own lives with these overarching narrative arcs. 
As an example, in the vast majority of Christian churches – of most types – the worship life of the congregation is woven on the framework of the lectionary.  The Christian lectionary is a (usually) three-year cycle of readings that works its way systematically from the beginning of Genesis through the end of Revelations.  Sunday after Sunday, week after week, month after month, the texts are laid out in such a way that the whole of the Christian Story is made relevant to the lived experience of the congregants and so that the congregants are returned, again and again, to their normative Story. 
I know, I can tell, some of you are saying, “That’s what was happening in my last church?”  Yeah, well, some do it better than others, but that’s at least the theory behind the lectionary.  In a regular, repeated, and systematic way people are taken step by step through the Bible with the intention of bringing those sacred texts to bear on the lives of the people and the people’s lived experience to bear on the texts.
Now we Unitarian Universalist have taken a different tack.  Some time ago we eschewed any one overarching narrative; we stopped seeing any one Story as normative for us.  Like Joseph Campbell, perhaps, we began to see the relationships and interconnectedness among the world’s Great Stories.  We came to recognize their relativity.
And, so, you might say that we went through our own exodus, freeing ourselves from the bondage to a text and the structure of a lectionary.  We ceased to engage in lectionary worship and began to engage, instead, in thematic worship.  Clergy and lay worship leaders were now free each week to explore the themes which they felt most relevant.  And in many ways this has been a good and enriching thing for us.
And, yet, as any good Story will have already told you, with every blessing comes with a curse; for every mountaintop there is a valley.
You see, I think that there is a reason that the majority of the world’s religions we humans have created have explicitly held up a story, or a connected canon of stories, and encouraged their adherents to align the story of their own lives with these overarching narrative arcs.  The reason is because we human beings are by nature both meaning seekers and storytellers.  If it can be truly said that God created humans because God loves stories, the reverse is true as well – we human beings so love stories that we have created gods and goddesses and heroes and villains and journeys and quests and epic love and all that other “stuff” we know from the Grand Old Tales.  And, as Bill Moyers noted, there is energy in that stuff – real, potent, needed energy – and when we Unitarian Universalists divorced ourselves from the Story – because, in the end, of course, all of those stories really are just One Story – we separated ourselves from something that gives meaning, and clarity, and vitality to life.
I think this is why, in part, there’s the perception that Unitarian Universalism is not a real religion, that our worship is “dry as dust” or, as our own St. Ralph once called it, “corpse cold.”  It’s why so many have experience worship in our sanctuaries as interesting lectures and lovely concerts.  It’s why so many people, who love our Principles and our ideals and our stance on issues of justice and the freedom we offer one another, look around after they’ve been in one of our congregations for a while and ask, “but isn’t there anything . . . more?”
A growing number of our congregations – and some of our growing congregations at that – have begun to experiment with a return to the lectionary.  But not the Christian lectionary.  Not a text-based lectionary at all.  Instead, these communities have been working on the creation of theme-based lectionaries – a (usually) three-year cycle of themes that are explored a month at a time, over and over again, going ever deeper, moving the congregation over time through a journey that reflects and is reflected in their own journeys. 
Those congregations that have experimented with doing this have found, besides a greater feeling of coherence among the services from week to week, a real sense of that . . . “more.”  The Lifespan Faith Development Program – religious education for children, youth, and adults – can be more intimately tied to the thematic focus of the worship.  Supplemental materials can be developed so that individuals and families can explore the themes of worship more deeply at home on their own.  And because the thematic focus from week to week is based on a two- or three-year cycle, it’s possible for those who plan worship to have at least a general idea of what’ll be explored not just a week or two in advance, but a year or two.  Can you imagine the kind of creative collaborations this could make possible?  The kind of breadth and depth that this could engender?
You can probably tell that I’m pretty excited by this development in our movement.  It’s one of the things I studied from my vantage point as the Director of the Office of Worship and Music Resources at our Association’s headquarters in Boston.  Getting the chance to be part of this experiment is one of the reasons I was excited to get back into the parish.  And when I met Leia during my pre-candidating weekend, one of the things that excited me about TJMC was that she’d been hankering to try it out too.  And so, over the summer, before I was even on the payroll, I set up a wiki site on the Internet so that Leia, I, and the Worship Associates could explore what this might mean for us here over the next year, and what themes we thought we should begin with.
I will say that for me, one of the failings of this “theme-based ministry” approach (as it’s been developed so far) is that the monthly themes don’t always seem to me to express any kind of connection among themselves.  There’s no “narrative flow” to the year, and this, it seems to me, is one of the key features of the traditional lectionary model, and one of its most important gifts.   So this is something we’ll be experimenting with here:  what is the narrative, what is the Story, that will most help us – UUs living in 21st century Charlottesville, Virginia – to make sense of our lives?  
For right now, the coming year looks something like this:
In the Fall, we gather together once again, take a bit of a collective in-breath, and tend to begin looking inward as we prepare for winter.  We remember those who have died, remember our interconnectedness, and give thanks.  For the months of September, October, and November our themes will be Hospitality, Atonement, and Gratitude.
In the Winter, shorter days and longer nights encourage us to light those festival fires, snuggle up with one another, celebrate hearth and home, kith and kin.  Yet it has also been seen by many as, perhaps, the most realistic of the seasons, a time to look at things squarely and without flinching.  And so December, January, and February will see us exploring Incarnation, Death, and Justice.
Spring is a time during which the earth awakens and so do we.  It’s a time to celebrate freedom from all kinds of bondage, to remember those who have sacrificed, to honor the re-birthing earth, the re-birthing spirit, and the spirit of community.  In March, April, and May our themes will be Grace, Creation, and Faith.
And then there’s Summer – life is vibrant, full, and lush, and even for those who must keep up the daily grind there’s still a sense of openness and possibility.  For June, July, and August we will explore Letting Go, Freedom, and Peace.
Hospitality, Atonement, Gratitude, Incarnation, Death, Justice, Grace, Creation, Faith, Letting Go, Freedom, and Peace – twelve of the great themes of our human experience tied to the movement of the seasons, which reflect and are a reflection of the movement of our own lives. 
Someone asked me the other day what I was going to be preaching about this Sunday and, after I told him, he said, “Oh . . . so it’s going to be an institutional sermon.  When are you going to start telling us about what you believe?”
Okay . . . I believe this:  what we do here matters.
Life can be hard.  It can be scary.  It can be confusing.  It can be unfair.  Siddhartha Buddha said, “life is suffering,” and while that might not seem like the way to sum up your every waking minute, there’s no doubt that it can be rough.  And even when it’s going well there can be the fear that that’s soon going to come to an end, or we know someone somewhere for whom it is hard, and we feel for them and with them.
And there is no secret place in the woods, and no matter how intricately you build your fire it’ll still be just a fire, and there are no magic formula to make everything “okay” for all times and all peoples.
But we do have the stories.  And I believe that the stories are enough.  Or, rather, I believe that the stories are enough if we’re willing to learn from them and then put what we learn into practice.  It isn’t easy, but no one said it would be (at least, not in the stories I liked best).  But it is possible.  All of the stories agree on that.  It is possible.  If we join with others on our journey, and follow the signs and the guides, we will get there.
[The Order of Service tells you that we’re going to be singing, “When I Am Frightened,” now, but I’m thinking that we ought to turn instead to the song written by the Ghanaian drummer Sol Amarifio, #1020 in the teal hymnal, “Woyaya.”]

NOTE:  You can find the podcast of this sermon on the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church's website.